By Andy States, SMACsportsnet.com
You know, sometimes things just don’t make sense.
A few years back at a previous job, one of my duties was to put together All-County teams for various sports. The initial instructions were to put together a first and second team, plus any possible honorable mentions. To me, it just didn’t make sense because in a couple counties, in particular, in some sports there were only three participating schools. If a person had to compile two teams plus honorable mentions, you may as well just print all of the team rosters and call them All-County – and what kind of honor is that?
In all fairness, that’s just the way things had always been done. But that didn’t make it right and it certainly didn’t mean that the system couldn’t be improved. And that thought brings me to an always-popular topic this time of year – the playoff draw system.
The Maryland Public Secondary Schools Athletic Association released its baseball draw on Wednesday. That yearly occurrence has been a sore spot for more than a couple local coaches over the past few years, specific ally in regard to the 3A South Region where the bulk of the SMAC schools compete against several from Prince George’s County.
The SMAC has typically been one of, if not the, best baseball conferences in the state from top to bottom. And while there are still very good P.G. teams, generally the ones that reside in the 3A/2A/1A ranks aren’t on the same level as the SMAC opposition. So, with just the top four seeds determined based on regular season record and the rest randomly seeded, it leaves open the possibility for plenty of hurt feelings when the draw is released.
Two years ago top 3A South seed Northern – that year’s SMAC champs – were rewarded with a brutal draw against SMAC teams. The Patriots reached the regional final but lost to Huntingtown – which proceeded to within an eyelash of the state championship - which benefitted from an easier draw on the other side. To be fair, Huntingtown was very good, and proved that with a SMAC championship and successful defense of its regional title last year.
For all the complaints different people have voiced through the years, I usually would be of the opinion that it all evens out eventually. Furthermore, if a team is the best they should just go out and prove it on the field. That said, one needs to look no further than this year’s 3A South draw makes is quite clear that it’s time to change the system.
On the top half of the draw with SMAC champion and No. 1 seed La Plata? Well, the Warriors’ phenomenal regular season is rewarded with tough potential opponents in Chopticon, Lackey (last year’s regional runner-up), Great Mills (which handed La Plata one of its two losses) and Huntingtown (two-time defending region champs) – all SMAC teams.
On the other side, all of the region’s P.G. teams – Largo, Potomac, Crossland and Friendly – with Northern and Westlake from SMAC – both of whom finished in the bottom half of the SMAC standings but would have to be favored to reach the regional final from that half of the bracket. Nothing against those two programs, as both have been extremely competitive through the years. But this isn’t how a tournament is supposed to work. What would happen if the NCAA loaded all the best teams into the top halves of its brackets for the men’s basketball tournament? The madness it loves to market in March would end real quick, that’s what.
In a playoff format where every team gets into the field, there can be nothing more accurate than a team’s record in determining who should be seeded where. Sure, some schools play in stronger conferences, but nothing can be done about that. Seeding by record is still infinitely better than taking chances with a random draw, which has proven time and again in the 3A South to be a less-than-acceptable option.
I’ve heard it argued several times over the years that seeding by record isn’t fair because the lesser teams have nothing to play for if they’re forced to go against teams that are just simply better. I have a couple of thoughts and one illustration on that.
First, is it only important to be fair to the lesser teams? Because in being ‘fair’ to them by those standards, you’re being unfair to the teams that worked hard to get in position for a top seed. And actually, what is more ‘fair’ than seeding teams in exactly the manner their records would warrant.
Second, life isn’t always fair and, fair or not, that’s something we all have to learn to understand at some point. At its basic level, high school sports should play a role in the complete education and growth in a student. We don’t all get trophies, and I think most of the kids are smart and mature enough to understand that. It’s baseball (or any other sport). The idea is to compete – one team wins and the other loses.
The other variable in the equation is the fact that some of the lesser teams are actually quite ready for their seasons to end. Back in the spring of 2003, I was covering a lacrosse game, a regular-season finale, between two teams that I’ll refer to as Team A and Team B. Neither team was really a contender in conference or beyond. During the game another coach (of Team C) came to the game and sauntered over to where I was conversing with a colleague.
Team C’s coach went on to tell us that he had come down to inform Team A’s coach that word had filtered through to him through his players (those of Team C, who were county rivals and friends of those on Team A) that many of the players on Team A planned on tanking their first playoff game to get it done with and reclaim their after-school lives with the summer fast approaching. They figured they were going to lose, anyway, so why not expedite it and have the weekend free?
An isolated incident, certainly, but while one would hope those types of things don’t often go on who’s to say they definitely don’t? The bottom line is if a team doesn’t have a great chance of winning, that doesn’t change whether they play the region’s best team or a mediocre team in the first round.
There are a couple of easy solutions to the seeding mess. One, just do the sensible thing and seed everyone according to record. If you don’t do that then you may as well do everything randomly across the board. Get rid of the top four seeds. Stop seeding football playoff teams based on their point average, do that randomly, too. Don’t seed wrestlers for the state tournament based on their regional tournament performances, just throw all 16 names in a hat for each weight class and randomly pick them.
Why does the top seed in say, the 135-pound weight class, wrestle a No. 4 seed (the lowest numbered seed for the non-wrestling folks) in the first-round of the state tournament? Because that’s what they earned when they won a regional championship.
The other solution, and this may not be popular, is to abolish this open format where every school gets into the playoffs. Change the system so teams have to qualify for the postseason, as they do in football and dual wrestling. I would propose knocking the regional fields down to no more than six. You’d risk losing Cinderella runs like the 2003 Patuxent Panthers or last year’s Thomas Stone Cougars – both teams that suffered through mediocre regular seasons in an excellent conference but caught fire in the playoffs – but you’d maintain the integrity of the regular season. Surely the regular season has to count for something, doesn’t it? Doesn’t it?
It’s high time to improve the system. What better time than now?